search

conda-forge / airflow-feedstock

A conda-smithy repository for airflow.
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
6 stars 17 forks source link

Initial support for Python 3 #1

Closed mcg1969 closed 7 years ago

mcg1969 commented 7 years ago

I've been running Airflow successfully on Python 3 for awhile, so it seems reasonable to see if we can get this recipe working for it.

conda-forge-linter commented 7 years ago

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

sodre commented 7 years ago

I know the PR is working right now, do you want to change anything in it before I merge?

mcg1969 commented 7 years ago

My only concern is that the CI builds only tested 27, as far as I can tell. I think the scripts need to be re-rendered. Seems a shame that it needs to be merged first before we can test that.

mcg1969 commented 7 years ago

Ah, and I guess I need to increment the build number....

sodre commented 7 years ago

I think you can re-render on your side as well.

On May 30, 2017, at 7:50 PM, Michael C. Grant notifications@github.com wrote:

My only concern is that the CI builds only tested 27, as far as I can tell. I think the scripts need to be re-rendered. Seems a shame that it needs to be merged first before we can test that.

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/conda-forge/airflow-feedstock/pull/1#issuecomment-305041037, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA_rVTL5fFh6aVdfRq1qytwibDvsP1vaks5r_KtDgaJpZM4Nq-mu.

mcg1969 commented 7 years ago

OK, I've re-rendered. Let's see how it goes...

sodre commented 7 years ago

I initiated a PR against flask-cache to get it to 3.6. Would you like to try the build for 3.5 so we can get it merged today, or do you rather wait for @conda-forge/flask-cache to merge their PR first?

mcg1969 commented 7 years ago

Ah, sorry, I should have read your comment first. I think we can go either way with this. I'm not in a huge hurry; on the other hand, I run Python 3.5.