Closed mfansler closed 1 month ago
Hello @mfansler, were you able to make any progress on this? 🙂
@hoechenberger no. I was kinda hoping someone from @conda-forge/core would share some guidance 🤞. I also have low expectation the suggested changes will make any difference - as is works perfectly fine for aarch64, and seems mostly superficial API changes.
The other thing they suggested is disconnecting and reconnecting the repositories - but I have no control on that, and we're talking hundreds of potentially impacted feedstocks.
But I give it a go on https://github.com/conda-forge/r-backbone-feedstock/pull/15. (i.e., test changing .travis.yml
).
Just make an edit by hand in a feedstock and see what happens.
Comment:
I've been in touch with Travis CI Support regarding https://github.com/conda-forge/status/issues/178. In a recent email, they've suggested try changing:
language: generic
tolanguage: shell
matrix.include
tojobs.include
to see if that makes any difference. How should I actually test these? I realize this could be a simple PR here, but seems like jumping the gun to update
conda-smithy
itself without evidence that these changes aren't superficial.Should I test manually overwriting these (i.e., temporarily edit the
.travis.yml
without a rerender) in a draft PR on an affected repository?