Rebuild with relaxed binutils pin

conda-forge / ctng-compilers-feedstock

A conda-smithy repository for ctng-compilers.

BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License

12 stars 28 forks source link

Rebuild with relaxed binutils pin #16

Closed jakirkham closed 4 years ago

jakirkham commented 4 years ago

Generate some fresh compiler packages with relaxed binutils ping.

Checklist

[x] Used a fork of the feedstock to propose changes
[x] Bumped the build number (if the version is unchanged)
[ ] Reset the build number to 0 (if the version changed)
[x] Re-rendered with the latest conda-smithy (Use the phrase code>@<space/conda-forge-admin, please rerender in a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)
[ ] Ensured the license file is being packaged.

conda-forge-linter commented 4 years ago

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipe:

The home item is expected in the about section.
The license item is expected in the about section.
The summary item is expected in the about section.
The outputs section contained an unexpected subsection name. target is not a valid subsection name.
The outputs section contained an unexpected subsection name. target is not a valid subsection name.
The outputs section contained an unexpected subsection name. target is not a valid subsection name.
The outputs section contained an unexpected subsection name. target is not a valid subsection name.

isuruf commented 4 years ago

@conda-forge-admin, rerender

jakirkham commented 4 years ago

@conda-forge-admin, please re-render.

Edit: Sorry only saw your comment after posting

conda-forge-linter commented 4 years ago

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-webservice.

I tried to re-render for you, but it looks like there was nothing to do.

conda-forge-linter commented 4 years ago

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-webservice.

I tried to re-render for you, but it looks like I wasn't able to push to the rebuild branch of jakirkham-feedstocks/ctng-compilers-feedstock. Did you check the "Allow edits from maintainers" box?

jakirkham commented 4 years ago

Looks like ppc64le nearly completes on Travis CI, but not quite. aarch64 fails within ~20mins. Not sure if this is expected or what we should do about that.

beckermr commented 4 years ago

We've been able to complete some builds of ppc64le in the past, but yeah. We simply don't have long enough CI times on ARM right now.

beckermr commented 4 years ago

@isuruf has built some stuff by hand before

jakirkham commented 4 years ago

Ah ok 👍