search

conda-forge / eigen-feedstock

A conda-smithy repository for eigen.
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
2 stars 15 forks source link

Rebuild for Python 3.7, GCC 7, R 3.5.1, openBLAS 0.3.2 #20

Closed regro-cf-autotick-bot closed 6 years ago

regro-cf-autotick-bot commented 6 years ago

It is likely this feedstock needs to be rebuilt. Notes and instructions for merging this PR:

  1. Please merge the PR only after the tests have passed.
  2. Feel free to push to the bot's branch to update this PR if needed.

Please note that if you close this PR we presume that the feedstock has been rebuilt, so if you are going to perform the rebuild yourself don't close this PR until the your rebuild has been merged.

This package has the following downstream children: ad3-cpp alpenglow fenics libcmaes libsakura And potentially more.

If this PR was opened in error or needs to be updated please add the bot-rerun label to this PR. The bot will close this PR and schedule another one.

This PR was created by the cf-regro-autotick-bot. The cf-regro-autotick-bot is a service to automatically track the dependency graph, migrate packages, and propose package version updates for conda-forge. If you would like a local version of this bot, you might consider using rever. Rever is a tool for automating software releases and forms the backbone of the bot's conda-forge PRing capability. Rever is both conda (conda install -c conda-forge rever) and pip (pip install re-ver) installable. Finally, feel free to drop us a line if there are any issues!

conda-forge-linter commented 6 years ago

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

jakirkham commented 6 years ago

This is header only. I don't think we need this. How should we proceed @CJ-Wright?

CJ-Wright commented 6 years ago

I'm not certain. It might be nice to get the tests to pass if possible ping @conda-forge/bot

CJ-Wright commented 6 years ago

I guess we still need this since this is currently our only mechanism to get things up on the gcc7 label. That might not be true in the future though. The bot won't delete this branch if you close though, so feel free to close if need be.

jakirkham commented 6 years ago

Honestly have been debating dropping the tests for the same reason (i.e. it’s header only). A quick file check should be fine.

mariusvniekerk commented 6 years ago

easy enough to make the environment use the ${CXX} environment variable ?