Open peterjc opened 4 years ago
I also use emacs in -nw mode all the time (via an alias). I've used this package on headless machines before (docker containers) and it works just fine because it installs the xorg packages as dependencies (but it still actually loads in the terminal unless you have some kind of X forwarding enabled).
Is there an advantage to having a nox package that doesn't build the GUI at all, other than not having to use -nw all the time? And is there any conda-forge precedent on how the package should be named? Can conda be told that emacs-nox
and emacs
are mutually exclusive? I know there is features, but that seems to be out these days.
I don’t know how this fits in the conda scheme - if there are no guidelines following the Debian naming made sense to me.
I didn't see anything in the conda-forge docs and I didn't see any packages with "nox". Maybe someone from @conda-forge/core can comment? I'm not even sure how to maintain such a thing? Is there a way to have two recipes in the same feedstock? Or do you have to use a separate branch?
Is there a way to have two recipes in the same feedstock?
You can only have one recipe, but you can have variants. For example see https://github.com/conda-forge/blas-feedstock/blob/master/recipe/conda_build_config.yaml where we have 3 variants built from the same recipe. Values in that file are available as jinja variables in meta.yaml
, so you could do,
package:
name: emacs # [with_x == "yes"]
name: emacs-nox # [with_x == "no"]
And then do the following for mutual exclusivity.
requirements:
run_constrained:
- emacs-nox 9999 # [with_x == "yes"]
- emacs 9999 # [with_x == "no"]
I don't plan to work on this but you can go ahead and do it if you want @peterjc. You can also add yourself as a recipe maintainer if you want.
Debian has
apt-get install emacs
for a full package with X, and andapt-get install emacs-nox
for a version without any X support. Cross reference #11.I would like to be able to do the same in conda, i.e.
conda install emacs-nox
and have a command line only emacs suitable for use on headless machines etc.My personal use case is on macOS where strongly dislike the X windows emacs, and currently use the following as a workaround:
alias emacs="emacs -nw"
andexport EDITOR="emacs -nw"