search

conda-forge / gdal-feedstock

A conda-smithy repository for gdal.
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
30 stars 62 forks source link

Rebuild for libarrow 16 (and skip ppc64le builds) #917

Closed regro-cf-autotick-bot closed 2 months ago

regro-cf-autotick-bot commented 2 months ago

This PR has been triggered in an effort to update libarrow16.

Notes and instructions for merging this PR:

  1. Please merge the PR only after the tests have passed.
  2. Feel free to push to the bot's branch to update this PR if needed.

Please note that if you close this PR we presume that the feedstock has been rebuilt, so if you are going to perform the rebuild yourself don't close this PR until the your rebuild has been merged.

If this PR was opened in error or needs to be updated please add the bot-rerun label to this PR. The bot will close this PR and schedule another one. If you do not have permissions to add this label, you can use the phrase code>@<space/conda-forge-admin, please rerun bot in a PR comment to have the conda-forge-admin add it for you.

This PR was created by the regro-cf-autotick-bot. The regro-cf-autotick-bot is a service to automatically track the dependency graph, migrate packages, and propose package version updates for conda-forge. Feel free to drop us a line if there are any issues! This PR was generated by https://github.com/regro/cf-scripts/actions/runs/9011445701 - please use this URL for debugging.

conda-forge-webservices[bot] commented 2 months ago

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

akrherz commented 2 months ago

Ah, we are jammed as there is no longer a proj=9.4.0 for ppc64le conda-forge/proj.4-feedstock#143

rouault commented 2 months ago

Ah, we are jammed as there is no longer a proj=9.4.0 for ppc64le

let's skip ppc64le for GDAL then? (or maybe PROJ 9.4.0 could have be deployed on pcc64le, even if broken for one test, ignoring it?)

akrherz commented 2 months ago

let's skip ppc64le for GDAL then?

Maybe, but I await @xylar to chime in!

xylar commented 2 months ago

I believe we need to skip ppc64le for now. If someone wants to take on investigating the problem (https://github.com/conda-forge/proj.4-feedstock/pull/142), that would be welcome. @mwtoews made some headway but ultimately, we decided to drop support for ppc64le, see: https://github.com/conda-forge/proj.4-feedstock/pull/141 https://github.com/conda-forge/proj.4-feedstock/pull/143 https://github.com/conda-forge/admin-requests/pull/981 Originally, we had tried skipping the failing test in proj4, but that just caused problems downstream in pyproj: https://github.com/conda-forge/pyproj-feedstock/pull/148

There was a general consensus that the failing test could not be safely skipped and ultimately would need to be addressed but that we didn't have the bandwidth and/or expertise. Some also felt that too much precious maintainer time was being wasted on a rare and exotic architecture.

akrherz commented 2 months ago

@conda-forge-admin please rerender