Open weiji14 opened 4 years ago
Do you mean a separate gmt-nightly feedstock?
We actually have a devel branch in the gmt-feedstock, but I'm not sure if it's a good idea to have a nightly release, since the packages (Linux, macOS and Windows) would be almost 200 MB for each release.
Found this one https://github.com/conda-forge/cfep/pull/3, but haven't read it yet.
Originally posted by @seisman in https://github.com/GenericMappingTools/pygmt/pull/485#issuecomment-647734037
Using the conda-forge/label/dev
would probably do. We could make a 'weekday-only' or 'weekly' build instead if space is an issue (for reference, the libcudf nightly builds are ~130 MB each). Edit: Just as a reminder,gmt
actually has a devel branch already (see #9 for how it started), so it should be 'easy' enough to just use that.
A separate gmt-nightly
feedstock might be harder to maintain. The rapidsai cudf library is a bit more complex with GPU build dependencies and does theirs through an nvidia docker build. One benefit to this though, would be to avoid cluttering up the https://anaconda.org/conda-forge/gmt/files page.
Ping @leouieda and @ocefpaf for comments on this.
While conda-forge does support some dev releases, in theory, we are a software repository for stable releases. With that said, I'm OK if you want to use the dev channel for that I just cannot help setting that up and supporting it.
Glad to know that at least conda-forge doesn't forbid it.
@weiji14 I like the idea of gmt dev builds. As one of the maintainers of the feedstock, I think I have the power to approve the idea. 😃
The dev builds can at least benefits:
Some details:
Issue:
Continuing the discussion from https://github.com/GenericMappingTools/pygmt/pull/485. Just to emphasize that the nightly builds are not meant to be supported (and if that's a concern, I'm happy to close this issue). That said, it would help users wanting the latest bugfix and not wanting to compile from source.
Environment (
conda list
):Details about
conda
and system (conda info
):