Closed dbolduc closed 1 year ago
Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.
I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe
) and found it was in an excellent condition.
I could not figure out how to add commits onto #138, so here is a new PR.
That's because you're not a maintainer on this feedstock... yet? ;-) I see you're an upstream maintainer, so I'd be happy to have you on board!
(to do so, add your GH handle in the appropriate section at the end of the meta.yaml
)
Also, note that this PR doesn't automatically get the newest protobuf version pulled in (that takes extra steps which are currently waiting in a separate PR). So IIUC, we shouldn't yet remove the patch that disables some features, because this build is still against protobuf 3.21. Some short discussion on this with Carlos is in #136
add your GH handle in the appropriate section
Done.
this PR doesn't automatically get the newest protobuf version pulled in
Ah, ok. I now see how the "Rebuild for protobuf423" PRs update the protobuf version in the .ci_support/*.yaml
files.
I rebased the patch. (Maybe I could have included the commits from #137 in this PR, but oh well).
Ah, ok. I now see how the "Rebuild for protobuf423" PRs update the protobuf version in the
.ci_support/*.yaml
files.
We don't have to do that manually, that's done by the bot (which can be invoked like [at]conda-forge-admin, please rerender
, or if you have conda smithy
installed locally, as conda smithy rerender
in the feedstock base folder).
If you want we can already pick the relevant commit (https://github.com/conda-forge/google-cloud-cpp-feedstock/pull/137/commits/6da07f47b93a60bec4379fc731c6d11bd8faadfd) into this PR and then rerender. Or we do it in separate PRs (which is perhaps cleaner), no strong feelings.
Happy to have you on board!
I could not figure out how to add commits onto #138, so here is a new PR.