Open yarikoptic opened 2 months ago
We typically do such downstream testing within the core package. Is there any reason to do that here in the conda feedstock as opposed to over in https://github.com/hdmf-dev/hdmf ?
greedy me would want it to be done everywhere ;-) specifically testing in distribution X would ensure that versions in distribution X are all good/consistent .
but sure -- start e.g. with hdmf and add dandi there? ;-) that would pretty much test development against pypi distribution.
85 auto released 3.14.4 which is known to be "buggy" as triggered by dandi-cli . Might be great to add downstream testing to ensure that new releases do not break pynwb and dandi feedstocks. We used to do that in git-annex feedstock for datalad downstream testing