Closed msarahan closed 7 years ago
There is no long term solution to adding extra channels yet, but it can be fudged here for testing.
Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.
I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe
) and found it was in an excellent condition.
We probably should switch from binstar.org to anaconda.org. :wink:
We probably should switch from binstar.org to anaconda.org. :wink:
I uploaded new m2-ca-certificates packages with bumped build numbers. Is there a way to retrigger the AppVeyor build?
I usually just close/reopen the PR. Doing that now. Fingers crossed...
The new packages may not have synced across yet since I only did it about an hour ago.
@mingwandroid, md5 checksums keep failing.
@ccordoba12 it's getting the right ca-ceritifcates (build 102) now:
m2-ca-certificates: 20150426-102```
Can someone please close and reopen this? I want to see if it uses m2-coreutils 8.25-101
from anaconda.org/msys2
instead. I suspect the failure was due to link.exe being from coreutils and not the MSVC linker. Build 101 fixes this.
Seems like an unrelated mirroring/connectivity problem, my new build was being used which is good. Can we spin it once more please?
OK, drat. What would be helpful here is to be able to setup build artefacts on AppVeyor so config.log could be inspected. Otherwise, @msarahan, can you change:
bash runConfigureICU MSYS/MSVC
to:
bash -x runConfigureICU MSYS/MSVC
it might give us some more clues.
Should we restart this again or have there been any changes since the last build failure?
I don't think just restarting it is going to work. I think we need to make sure it's working locally first.
Locally was fine, let's see what bash -x gives us. @jakirkham any clues about adding artefacts to AppVeyor builds? IMHO, it'd be good if we could recursively glob a series of patterns and add those.
I think @jjhelmus added something like that for staged-recipes. I think this is what you need, @mingwandroid. Though I don't know if there is more to it or not.
This is the issue: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/conda-forge/icu-feedstock/build/1.0.37/job/i8v51c2tm1hyosp1#L523
I have no idea what is adding that, or why, but it's breaking the configure checks.
It's a metadata path: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/x1x72k9t.aspx
seems like the win sdk sets this, but VS does not. I think I'm going to add something to just unset it.
Did I break appveyor? seems like it is not getting triggered any more...
Maybe. 😆 It has happened to me before too. Let's have it sit for a bit.
One thing you could try is to create a project under your user for icu and try testing this branch there for the interim.
Looks like you are getting somewhere, @msarahan. The Python 2.7 builds have passed. The rest are waiting to run.
I won't start celebrating until 3.4 x64 passes.
Good news.
I got the vs2010 / Win7.1 SDK build to work locally (up to a make check
segfault). It seems that link.exe reads the CL environment variable, and we're converting it from POSIX to Windows form. Just after where you set MSYS2_ARG_CONV_EXCL, add:
set "MSYS2_ENV_CONV_EXCL=CL"
Also, while you're at it, I'd add "/out" to MSYS2_ARG_CONV_EXCL since I saw that case used in the logs (it didn't matter in this instance since I think a Windows program was calling another one, but it can't hurt).
Does anyone know why my conda-build
console text has gone green now that I've installed Win7.1 SDK? Is there a way around this?
@mingwandroid, green text is just windows envying your superior MSYS2 technology. I don't know how to help it get over it.
Seriously, I have ignored it, as it did not seem to affect functionality. Does setenv.cmd called by itself (outside the icu build) do this?
Note: I have not succeeded in getting the win 7.1 SDK installed. If you have tips on that, it would help me debug these things faster. I suspect I might need to remove vs 2010 pro?
So, this is at least building through on VS 2010 64-bit. However, the make check
step has an error. Definitely an improvement, but worth investigation.
Sorry, I think I caused conflicts for you by merging the re-rendering PR ( https://github.com/conda-forge/icu-feedstock/pull/7 ). I'm hoping they should be pretty easy to fix as they include things like whitespace changes and shorter channel names.
@msarahan is this PR still relevant?
(I lost track of the status of MSYS2
but I want to work on it soon to get some R packages going.)
Sorry, I don't know what the state of our ICU is. If it's working on Windows just fine, then yes, I'd say this PR is irrelevant.
If it's working on Windows just fine
@gillins is probably more qualified to answer that. (Sorry for the noise I am just looking into some old stuff and doing some house cleaning.)
The Windows packages appear to be empty (no binaries inside). Not sure if this is intended, but I suspect something has gone wrong in the build...
IMHO this PR needs to be merged. Perhaps squashed a lot first (but not into a single commit) if we want a clean history. What is the conda-forge
rules regarding history?
IMHO this PR needs to be merged.
:+1:
Perhaps squashed a lot first (but not into a single commit) if we want a clean history. What is the
conda-forge
rules regarding history?
@mingwandroid history is not the problem here. This PR needs a rebase and an strategy to either use the msys2
or get msys2
into conda-forge
msys2
is now in defaults. You do not need to add channels to install any m2-
or m2w64-
prefixed packages anymore.
I'm happier with it being in defaults
too since due to ABI and dependency incompatibilities (conda-forge's libxml2 being linked to libicu for example - https://github.com/conda-forge/matplotlib-feedstock/pull/42) I cannot add -c conda-forge
during builds of software intended for the defaults
channel.
msys2
is now in defaults. You do not need to add channels to install anym2-
orm2w64-
prefixed packages anymore.
I think I already knew that but lost the information in the noise. Thanks!
I know @msarahan is busy so I will take this from his hands, rebase and see how it hows.
I'm happier with it being in
defaults
too since due to ABI incompatibilities I cannot add-c conda-forge
in general during builds of software I make fordefaults
.
I am interested in knowing what ABI incompatibilities
you are finding.It is always nice to get a heads up in future problems :smile:
@ocefpaf, I updated my comment, there are two incompatibilities, ABI and dependency choices, both are fatal to building packages intended for defaults
with -c conda-forge
on the conda-build
command-line since packages in defaults
can't depend on pakages from conda-forge
.
@ocefpaf, I updated my comment, there are two incompatibilities,
Thanks @mingwandroid!
We should share recipes as much as possible though. I do wonder if the amount and intrusive nature of some of the patching I'm having to do the retain backwards compatibility with CentOS 5.11 and OS X 10.7 will fly with conda-forge, and if not, what we can do about it. For reference, this qt5 recipe should be a good talking point (I think this is atypical and as bad as things will get due to the C++-ness and the size of Qt5):
https://github.com/mingwandroid/staged-recipes/tree/CentOS5-Windows-no-side-by-side/recipes/qt5
We should share recipes as much as possible though.
:+1:
We need you in our meetings :grin:
@mingwandroid I am having success building this in AppVeyor with msys2
. Awesome!
@msarahan what is the policy on $PREFIX/sbin/{genccode,gencmn,gennorm2,gensprep,icupkg}
files? Remove? move to $PREFIX/bin
? I am on the fence here.
We install them on Linux and Mac. Would like if we do the same with Windows. Will let others weigh in on where they go.
We install them on Linux and Mac. Would like if we do the same with Windows. Will let others weigh in on where they go.
I guess I need some context here. Are you referring to $PREFIX/sbin/{genccode,gencmn,gennorm2,gensprep,icupkg}
files? If so take a look at
https://github.com/conda-forge/icu-feedstock/blob/master/recipe/build.sh#L33
You're right. I'm confused. Was thinking of the bin
that we already provide.
So are you thinking we should start providing sbin
too? I'm ok with it. 👍
So went for a trip down memory lane. It seems @msarahan, @ccordoba12, and I decided to drop these sbin
executables as they didn't work properly and were pretty bulky. Would be ok with keeping them if we could get them to work. Though I suppose there is a question of including these bulky files. Not sure to what extent people using conda expect to use these.
Closing in favor of #11
This works locally - VS2008 and 2015 tested so far. Fingers crossed on Appveyor. I'm pretty sure it will fail on the first try, because it requires the msys2 channel to be added.
ping @pelson @ocefpaf - how should I go about adding that channel? @jakirkham - check this out when you get back