Closed xhochy closed 6 months ago
Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.
I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe
) and found some lint.
Here's what I've got...
For recipe:
I checked out the raw license files for the different builds locally.
Intel Simplified Software License
(Version October 2022) should indeed be the applicable license for all of them 👍 .
Should we expected "IntelSimplifiedSoftware" to be present in https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/blob/main/json/licenses.json or is it a conda-specific token?
We should not expect it to be there. The LicenseRef-
syntax indicates a custom token.
I'm also happy to change it to something else, as this can be an arbitrary string. I'm mostly interested in having a string that separates it from other Intel licenses.
One note - one of the reasons that this license is not SPDX conformant - it's not stable license and get ongoing working updates - so current versioning is important.
So LicenseRef-IntelSimplifiedSoftware is fine as long as there is no goal for differentiating between particular versions
Seems like it would be better to include the version then, too? Should I add a 2022 suffix?
Seems like it would be better to include the version then, too? Should I add a 2022 suffix?
or even like Oct2022 - as technically there might be multiple updates during year. Hopefully this will not happen
@conda-forge-admin please rerender
Updated to the dated-license and CI has passed, I hope this is ready for a merge now.
This allows us to differentiate the license of these packages from other proprietary Intel packages with a different license.
Checklist
0
(if the version changed)conda-smithy
(Use the phrase code>@<space/conda-forge-admin, please rerender in a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)