Closed beenje closed 2 years ago
next version of IPython will remove the dependency on black.
My mistake, I recall that those changes had landed upstream (maybe even by me), but somehow thought we had missed updating them here... I'll revert that change.
I started #165, and should be up in a couple hours. If you need something faster, you can add a temporary pin to your recipe, e.g. ipython !=8.0.1=*_1
or something.
If the problem persists for you (there's no telling with the conda solver sometime) we can look into getting the offending builds pulled from the repo metadata.
the builds are up on anaconda.org, but not yet on CDN... once they are (see the status page for a rough idea), we'll have a better idea of what conda
and mamba
make of the options and whether we need more drastic measures.
linux-64/ipython-8.0.1-py310hff52083_2.tar.bz2
linux-64/ipython-8.0.1-py38h578d9bd_2.tar.bz2
linux-64/ipython-8.0.1-py39hf3d152e_2.tar.bz2
linux-aarch64/ipython-8.0.1-py310h4c7bcd0_2.tar.bz2
linux-aarch64/ipython-8.0.1-py38he3eb160_2.tar.bz2
linux-aarch64/ipython-8.0.1-py39h4420490_2.tar.bz2
linux-ppc64le/ipython-8.0.1-py310h194a6c8_2.tar.bz2
linux-ppc64le/ipython-8.0.1-py38h8328f6c_2.tar.bz2
linux-ppc64le/ipython-8.0.1-py39h0b1cf3c_2.tar.bz2
osx-64/ipython-8.0.1-py310h2ec42d9_2.tar.bz2
osx-64/ipython-8.0.1-py38h50d1736_2.tar.bz2
osx-64/ipython-8.0.1-py39h6e9494a_2.tar.bz2
osx-arm64/ipython-8.0.1-py310hbe9552e_2.tar.bz2
osx-arm64/ipython-8.0.1-py38h10201cd_2.tar.bz2
osx-arm64/ipython-8.0.1-py39h2804cbe_2.tar.bz2
win-64/ipython-8.0.1-py310h5588dad_2.tar.bz2
win-64/ipython-8.0.1-py38haa244fe_2.tar.bz2
win-64/ipython-8.0.1-py39hcbf5309_2.tar.bz2
Thanks @bollwyvl! I have checked 2 different recipes and the latest ipython build is pulled. Build is working again.
This was fast enough for me :-) Thanks again. This issue can be closed.
Issue:
I have several conda recipes that depend on
ipython
and usepip check
in the tests. conda-build started to fail with:I guess it's linked to https://github.com/conda-forge/ipython-feedstock/pull/163
Should this be reverted? Or should I stop using
pip check
(it's added bygrayskull
)?