jaxlib 0.3.10 with cuda 11.2

conda-forge / jaxlib-feedstock

A conda-smithy repository for jaxlib.

BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License

16 stars 24 forks source link

jaxlib 0.3.10 with cuda 11.2 #103

Closed ngam closed 2 years ago

ngam commented 2 years ago

Closes #100 Fix #34 Closes #72

Checklist

[x] Used a personal fork of the feedstock to propose changes
[ ] Bumped the build number (if the version is unchanged)
[x] Reset the build number to 0 (if the version changed)
[x] Re-rendered with the latest conda-smithy (Use the phrase code>@<space/conda-forge-admin, please rerender in a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)
[x] Ensured the license file is being packaged.

conda-forge-linter commented 2 years ago

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

ngam commented 2 years ago

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

github-actions[bot] commented 2 years ago

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-webservice.

I tried to rerender for you, but it looks like there was nothing to do.

This message was generated by GitHub actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/jaxlib-feedstock/actions/runs/2335573413.

ngam commented 2 years ago

This is also ready for review. Same as PR #100 except jaxlib 0.3.10 instead of 0.3.7

ngam commented 2 years ago

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

ngam commented 2 years ago

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

ngam commented 2 years ago

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

xhochy commented 2 years ago

Can you please add the __cuda requirement to run?

ngam commented 2 years ago

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

github-actions[bot] commented 2 years ago

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-webservice.

I tried to rerender for you, but it looks like there was nothing to do.

This message was generated by GitHub actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/jaxlib-feedstock/actions/runs/2368078240.

xhochy commented 2 years ago

@ngam Seems like #100 fails reliably whereas this one only fails for the usual OSX SDK downloads. Thus when this turns green, I would merge it and close #100; or are you interested in also getting #100 merged?

ngam commented 2 years ago

@ngam Seems like #100 fails reliably whereas this one only fails for the usual OSX SDK downloads. Thus when this turns green, I would merge it and close #100; or are you interested in also getting #100 merged?

No, I don't care about #100. I am fine with merging this only. One of us will likely have to keep a close eye on these going forward to ensure they all get to green one way or another.