conda-forge / libspatialite-feedstock

A conda-smithy repository for libspatialite.
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
4 stars 11 forks source link

Rebuild for proj 9.4.0 #105

Closed regro-cf-autotick-bot closed 5 months ago

regro-cf-autotick-bot commented 5 months ago

This PR has been triggered in an effort to update proj940.

Notes and instructions for merging this PR:

  1. Please merge the PR only after the tests have passed.
  2. Feel free to push to the bot's branch to update this PR if needed.

Please note that if you close this PR we presume that the feedstock has been rebuilt, so if you are going to perform the rebuild yourself don't close this PR until the your rebuild has been merged.


If this PR was opened in error or needs to be updated please add the bot-rerun label to this PR. The bot will close this PR and schedule another one. If you do not have permissions to add this label, you can use the phrase code>@<space/conda-forge-admin, please rerun bot in a PR comment to have the conda-forge-admin add it for you.

This PR was created by the regro-cf-autotick-bot. The regro-cf-autotick-bot is a service to automatically track the dependency graph, migrate packages, and propose package version updates for conda-forge. Feel free to drop us a line if there are any issues! This PR was generated by https://github.com/regro/cf-scripts/actions/runs/8386951364, please use this URL for debugging.

conda-forge-webservices[bot] commented 5 months ago

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

akrherz commented 5 months ago

The test failures

FAIL: check_xls_load
====================

XL loaded

17 inserted rows
XL loaded

19 inserted rows
No duplicated rows have been identified
2 duplicated rows found !!!
No duplicated rows have been identified
2 duplicated rows deleted from: test2
XL datasource './test_xml.xlsx' is not valid
load_XL() #3 error: (null)

FAIL: check_virtualtable4
=========================

Error (XLSX): no such column: col_0
gillins commented 5 months ago

We already skip a lot of tests... Seems only Win64 reliably passes them all. Should we add yet another skip, or just stop doing the tests at all?

xylar commented 5 months ago

No strong feelings on my part.