conda-forge / libspatialite-feedstock

A conda-smithy repository for libspatialite.
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
4 stars 11 forks source link

Rebuild for geos3120 #96

Closed regro-cf-autotick-bot closed 1 year ago

regro-cf-autotick-bot commented 1 year ago

This PR has been triggered in an effort to update geos3120.

Notes and instructions for merging this PR:

  1. Please merge the PR only after the tests have passed.
  2. Feel free to push to the bot's branch to update this PR if needed.

Please note that if you close this PR we presume that the feedstock has been rebuilt, so if you are going to perform the rebuild yourself don't close this PR until the your rebuild has been merged.


If this PR was opened in error or needs to be updated please add the bot-rerun label to this PR. The bot will close this PR and schedule another one. If you do not have permissions to add this label, you can use the phrase code>@<space/conda-forge-admin, please rerun bot in a PR comment to have the conda-forge-admin add it for you.

This PR was created by the regro-cf-autotick-bot. The regro-cf-autotick-bot is a service to automatically track the dependency graph, migrate packages, and propose package version updates for conda-forge. Feel free to drop us a line if there are any issues! This PR was generated by https://github.com/regro/cf-scripts/actions/runs/5405316892, please use this URL for debugging.

conda-forge-webservices[bot] commented 1 year ago

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

gillins commented 1 year ago

@mwtoews do you think it is safe to skip this test on osx_64? Is this likely to be the same error mentioned here: https://github.com/conda-forge/geos-feedstock/pull/70#issuecomment-1610372045 ?

mwtoews commented 1 year ago

similar-ish. There's something odd with osx_64, but I don't know the main cause. I justified the skip for geos since it was one small test (of 466), but 99.5% of the other tests were fine. However, I'm unfamiliar with libspatialite to say if it should be a "safe skip" here. It looks like quite a few.

gillins commented 1 year ago

Just for the record, below are the failed tests. We used to skip more of them, can't remember why. I think I'll just patch all of the failed ones for all platforms and go from there.

linux64:
check_virtualtable6
check_sql_stmt_extension
check_sql_stmt_legacy
check_sql_stmt_tiny
check_sql_stmt

linuxarch64/ppc64le:
check_virtualtable6
check_sql_stmt_extension
check_sql_stmt_legacy
check_sql_stmt_tiny
check_sql_stmt
check_toponoface2d

osx64:
shape_primitives
check_virtualtable6
check_sql_stmt_extension
check_sql_stmt_legacy
check_sql_stmt_tiny
check_sql_stmt

(tests not run on wind64 or osx_arm64)