version suffixed LLVM tools

conda-forge / llvmdev-feedstock

A conda-smithy repository for llvmdev.

BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License

8 stars 42 forks source link

version suffixed LLVM tools #282

Closed isuruf closed 2 months ago

isuruf commented 2 months ago

Checklist

[ ] Used a personal fork of the feedstock to propose changes
[ ] Bumped the build number (if the version is unchanged)
[ ] Reset the build number to 0 (if the version changed)
[ ] Re-rendered with the latest conda-smithy (Use the phrase code>@<space/conda-forge-admin, please rerender in a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)
[ ] Ensured the license file is being packaged.

conda-forge-webservices[bot] commented 2 months ago

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

conda-forge-webservices[bot] commented 2 months ago

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipe/meta.yaml:

Failed to even lint the recipe, probably because of a conda-smithy bug :cry:. This likely indicates a problem in your meta.yaml, though. To get a traceback to help figure out what's going on, install conda-smithy and run conda smithy recipe-lint . from the recipe directory.

conda-forge-webservices[bot] commented 2 months ago

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

github-actions[bot] commented 2 months ago

Hi! This is the friendly conda-forge automerge bot!

Commits were made to this PR after the automerge label was added. For security reasons, I have disabled automerge by removing the automerge label. Please add the automerge label again (or ask a maintainer to do so) if you'd like to enable automerge again!

h-vetinari commented 2 months ago

On that topic, I was planning on excluding libllvm-c from llvmdev for v19; we only have it on windows, and it blows up the already very large download by another 20-30MB that no-one is really using. IMO people should opt into libllvm-c explicitly.

github-actions[bot] commented 2 months ago

Hi! This is the friendly conda-forge automerge bot!

I considered the following status checks when analyzing this PR:

linter: passed
azure: failed

Thus the PR was not passing and not merged.