search

conda-forge / netcdf4-feedstock

A conda-smithy repository for netcdf4.
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
3 stars 25 forks source link

Update .appveyor.yml to run the run_test.py #80

Closed mullenkamp closed 5 years ago

mullenkamp commented 5 years ago

Issue:

If we include the running of run_test.py as part of the appveyor CI test run, we can catch failures like #78 early. I only have a little bit of experience with CI in general (TravisCI) and no experience with appveyor, but this is a good opportunity to learn it since I'm forced to use Windows at work ;) I'll give it a try.


Details about conda and system ( conda info ):

``` active environment : base active env location : E:\programs\anaconda3_64bit shell level : 2 user config file : C:\Users\michaelek\.condarc populated config files : C:\Users\michaelek\.condarc conda version : 4.6.8 conda-build version : 3.17.8 python version : 3.6.7.final.0 base environment : E:\programs\anaconda3_64bit (writable) channel URLs : https://conda.anaconda.org/conda-forge/win-64 https://conda.anaconda.org/conda-forge/noarch https://conda.anaconda.org/mullenkamp/win-64 https://conda.anaconda.org/mullenkamp/noarch https://conda.anaconda.org/anaconda-fusion/win-64 https://conda.anaconda.org/anaconda-fusion/noarch https://repo.anaconda.com/pkgs/main/win-64 https://repo.anaconda.com/pkgs/main/noarch https://repo.anaconda.com/pkgs/free/win-64 https://repo.anaconda.com/pkgs/free/noarch https://repo.anaconda.com/pkgs/r/win-64 https://repo.anaconda.com/pkgs/r/noarch https://repo.anaconda.com/pkgs/msys2/win-64 https://repo.anaconda.com/pkgs/msys2/noarch package cache : E:\programs\anaconda3_64bit\pkgs C:\Users\michaelek\.conda\pkgs C:\Users\michaelek\AppData\Local\conda\conda\pkgs envs directories : E:\programs\anaconda3_64bit\envs C:\Users\michaelek\.conda\envs C:\Users\michaelek\AppData\Local\conda\conda\envs platform : win-64 user-agent : conda/4.6.8 requests/2.21.0 CPython/3.6.7 Windows/10 Windows/10.0.14393 administrator : False netrc file : None offline mode : False ```
ocefpaf commented 5 years ago

We do run the tests here and the problem does not exist on our CIs. I'm still trying to debug this.

mullenkamp commented 5 years ago

Sorry...maybe I'm confused somehow...If the tests were built in to the CIs, why didn't they fail?

ocefpaf commented 5 years ago

why didn't they fail?

That is what I'm investigating. They are passing in the CIs.