openblas v0.3.20

[regro-cf-autotick-bot]

It is very likely that the current package version for this feedstock is out of date.

Checklist before merging this PR:

• [ ] Dependencies have been updated if changed: see upstream
• [ ] Tests have passed
• [ ] Updated license if changed and license_file is packaged

Information about this PR:

1. Feel free to push to the bot's branch to update this PR if needed.
2. The bot will almost always only open one PR per version.
3. The bot will stop issuing PRs if more than 3 version bump PRs generated by the bot are open. If you don't want to package a particular version please close the PR.
4. If you want these PRs to be merged automatically, make an issue with code>@conda-forge-admin,</codeplease add bot automerge in the title and merge the resulting PR. This command will add our bot automerge feature to your feedstock.
5. If this PR was opened in error or needs to be updated please add the bot-rerun label to this PR. The bot will close this PR and schedule another one. If you do not have permissions to add this label, you can use the phrase code>@<space/conda-forge-admin, please rerun bot in a PR comment to have the conda-forge-admin add it for you.

Closes: #130

Pending Dependency Version Updates

Here is a list of all the pending dependency version updates for this repo. Please double check all dependencies before merging.

Name	Upstream Version	Current Version
ctng-compilers	11.2.0
openblas	0.3.20

Dependency Analysis

Please note that this analysis is highly experimental. The aim here is to make maintenance easier by inspecting the package's dependencies. Importantly this analysis does not support optional dependencies, please double check those before making changes. If you do not want hinting of this kind ever please add bot: inspection: false to your conda-forge.yml. If you encounter issues with this feature please ping the bot team conda-forge/bot.

Analysis by source code inspection shows a discrepancy between it and the the package's stated requirements in the meta.yaml.

Packages found by source code inspection but not in the meta.yaml:

• numpy
• pyamg

_{This PR was created by the regro-cf-autotick-bot. The regro-cf-autotick-bot is a service to automatically track the dependency graph, migrate packages, and propose package version updates for conda-forge. Feel free to drop us a line if there are any issues! This PR was generated by https://github.com/regro/autotick-bot/actions/runs/1972585571, please use this URL for debugging.}

[conda-forge-linter]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[h-vetinari]

Magically windows builds are passing again 🥳

[github-actions[bot]]

Hi! This is the friendly conda-forge automerge bot!

I considered the following status checks when analyzing this PR:

• linter: passed
• travis: passed
• azure: passed

Thus the PR was passing, but could not be merged (error=API error in POST to merge).

[h-vetinari]

@martin-frbg Conda-forge has been a bit behind with openblas due to some infrastructure hiccups (that seem to have resolved themselves now), but now it seems that there's something on PPC + ILP64 that got broken in 3.20 (i.e. the following errors did not appear in the CI for 3.19):

TEST 8/36 amax:samax [OK]
TEST 9/36 ismax:negative_step_2 [FAIL]
  ERR: test_ismin.c:89  expected 9, got 50
TEST 10/36 ismax:positive_step_2 [OK]
TEST 11/36 ismin:negative_step_2 [FAIL]
  ERR: test_ismin.c:63  expected 9, got 50
TEST 12/36 ismin:positive_step_2 [OK]

Would you like me to raise an issue upstream?

[martin-frbg]

very strange, nothing changed in this regard in 0.3.20 (except that the same fix that was made for ppc two years ago was copied to sparc in this version)

[martin-frbg]

not reproduced in my tests (debian11 ppc64le, power8, gcc/gfortran 10.2, openpower site at unicamp.br)

[h-vetinari]

Thank you very much for testing @martin-frbg

@isuruf, any idea what might be causing the PPC failures (though only with ILP64)? Do you think it might be another emulation problem and that we should just skip the tests?

[h-vetinari]

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

[github-actions[bot]]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-webservice.

I tried to rerender for you, but it looks like there was nothing to do.

This message was generated by GitHub actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/openblas-feedstock/actions/runs/2019671660.

[h-vetinari]

I'd like to unblock newer openblas (we've been stuck on 0.3.18 for a while). Could you comment on this @isuruf?

any idea what might be causing the PPC failures (though only with ILP64)? Do you think it might be another emulation problem and that we should just skip the tests?

[h-vetinari]

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender