Is this a typo?

[pepijndevos]

Checklist

• [ ] Used a personal fork of the feedstock to propose changes
• [ ] Bumped the build number (if the version is unchanged)
• [ ] Reset the build number to 0 (if the version changed)
• [ ] Re-rendered with the latest conda-smithy (Use the phrase code>@<space/conda-forge-admin, please rerender in a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)
• [ ] Ensured the license file is being packaged.

We're seeing

checking for perl... $BUILD_PREFIX/bin/perl
checking for minimum required perl version >= 5.006... 5.032001
checking for full perl installation... no
ERROR: Cannot find Config.pm or $Config{archlib}. A full perl installation is required.

and found some suspicious config variables:

https://github.com/conda-forge/staged-recipes/pull/18792#issuecomment-1112560474

Not sure if this is the root cause, but if this is a typo maybe it's a step in the right direction.

Or maybe it's related to #29

[conda-forge-linter]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[zklaus]

This does not seem to be a typo, but rather is Perls way of introducing relocatable builds. See https://github.com/Perl/perl5/blob/f8ed0a91515917f85c17206609b60adcb3b59fc4/INSTALL#L962.