Open ChrisBarker-NOAA opened 6 years ago
It's mostly the extra work that it would require (a noarch package is probably easier to maintain). If you want to, you are free to create a feedstock for it :)
I've waited for a long time to work on this -- one reason being that the source code was not published properly anywhere -- e.g. PyPi or a gitHub release.
However, it's now on PyPi, so I'm going to try to get that working.
Personally, I'd rather simply build it into PyOpenGL as one package -- after all, the point of conda packages is that they CAN include compiled code :-)
Would you be open to that?
Meanwhile, I need to get it building in any case ...
Any reason there isn't a pyopengl-accelerate feedstock?
Any any reason not to simply build it in to the pyopengl feedstock? is there any reason one wouldn't want accelerate in a conda environment?
-CHB