Closed h-vetinari closed 2 years ago
Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.
I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe
) and found it was in an excellent condition.
@mattip, the following error in windows is flaky (and it's the first time I see it), but just FYI:
================================== FAILURES ===================================
_________________________________ test_seterr _________________________________
[gw1] win32 -- Python 3.8.13 %PREFIX%\python.exe
..\_test_env\lib\site-packages\scipy\special\tests\test_sf_error.py:64: in test_seterr
_check_action(_sf_error_test_function, (error_code,), action)
action = 'warn'
category = 'no_result'
entry_err = {'arg': 'ignore', 'domain': 'ignore', 'loss': 'ignore', 'no_result': 'ignore', ...}
error_code = 6
geterr_olderr = {'arg': 'ignore', 'domain': 'ignore', 'loss': 'raise', 'other': 'ignore', ...}
newerr = {'arg': 'ignore', 'domain': 'ignore', 'loss': 'raise', 'other': 'ignore', ...}
seterr_olderr = {'arg': 'ignore', 'domain': 'ignore', 'loss': 'raise', 'no_result': 'ignore', ...}
..\_test_env\lib\site-packages\scipy\special\tests\test_sf_error.py:33: in _check_action
fun(*args)
E scipy.special._sf_error.SpecialFunctionError: scipy.special/_sf_error_test_function: (underflow) floating point underflow
action = 'warn'
args = (6,)
fun = <ufunc '_sf_error_test_function'>
:frowning_face:
☹️
It's not that bad. It seems rare enough that I don't mind restarting builds to get past it. In terms of priority (from the POV of this feedstock), the 1.9 stuff is more important (and I believe more tractable too).
Hopefully less flaky than after #204