initial release of pdfmorph meta.yaml

[sbillinge]

Checklist

• [x] Title of this PR is meaningful: e.g. "Adding my_nifty_package", not "updated meta.yaml".
• [x] License file is packaged (see here for an example).
• [x] Source is from official source.
• [x] Package does not vendor other packages. (If a package uses the source of another package, they should be separate packages or the licenses of all packages need to be packaged).
• [x] If static libraries are linked in, the license of the static library is packaged.
• [x] Package does not ship static libraries. If static libraries are needed, follow CFEP-18.
• [x] Build number is 0.
• [x] A tarball (url) rather than a repo (e.g. git_url) is used in your recipe (see here for more details).
• [x] GitHub users listed in the maintainer section have posted a comment confirming they are willing to be listed there.
• [x] When in trouble, please check our knowledge base documentation before pinging a team.

[conda-forge-webservices[bot]]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/diffpy.pdfmorph) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/diffpy.pdfmorph:

• Feedstock with the same name exists in conda-forge.
• Recipe maintainer "Simon Billinge" does not exist
• The following maintainers have not yet confirmed that they are willing to be listed here: Simon Billinge. Please ask them to comment on this PR if they are.

For recipes/diffpy.pdfmorph:

• Recipes should usually depend on matplotlib-base as opposed to matplotlib so that runtime environments do not require large packages like qt.

[sbillinge]

I am willing to be listed as a maintainer

[sbillinge]

Closling on the basis that we already have a feedstock for this package.