Add pelicanfs

[duncanmmacleod]

Checklist

• [x] Title of this PR is meaningful: e.g. "Adding my_nifty_package", not "updated meta.yaml".
• [x] License file is packaged (see here for an example).
• [x] Source is from official source.
• [x] Package does not vendor other packages. (If a package uses the source of another package, they should be separate packages or the licenses of all packages need to be packaged).
• [x] If static libraries are linked in, the license of the static library is packaged.
• [x] Package does not ship static libraries. If static libraries are needed, follow CFEP-18.
• [x] Build number is 0.
• [x] A tarball (url) rather than a repo (e.g. git_url) is used in your recipe (see here for more details).
• [ ] GitHub users listed in the maintainer section have posted a comment confirming they are willing to be listed there.
• [x] When in trouble, please check our knowledge base documentation before pinging a team.

[duncanmmacleod]

@turetske, please confirm that you are happy to be named as a co-maintainer of this recipe.

[github-actions[bot]]

Hi! This is the staged-recipes linter and I found some lint.

File-specific lints and/or hints:

• recipes/pelicanfs/meta.yaml:
  • lints:
  • The following maintainers have not yet confirmed that they are willing to be listed here: turetske. Please ask them to comment on this PR if they are.

[conda-forge-admin]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/pelicanfs/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[duncanmmacleod]

The build failure on windows is reported upstream here: https://github.com/PelicanPlatform/pelicanfs/pull/71. This is only a build failure, so can be ignored here given that this project is noarch: python.