Closed speth closed 2 years ago
Weird, we typically compile, link and run a few test files from the sundials distribution to avoid these things, but I see we no longer do. What are your thoughts here @jschueller ?
weird, I don't see any reference to blis anywhere in sundials sources
well I removed the custom test because the api changes too often, we better run the sundials test-suite
Thanks for the quick update, but I'm still seeing the same behavior after upgrading to the h558c624_1
build which I think incorporates the changes made in #75.
you must have the conda-forge channel as top priority to correctly resolve its packages, it should look like this:
channel URLs : https://conda.anaconda.org/conda-forge/linux-64
https://conda.anaconda.org/conda-forge/noarch
https://repo.anaconda.com/pkgs/main/linux-64
https://repo.anaconda.com/pkgs/main/noarch
https://repo.anaconda.com/pkgs/r/linux-64
https://repo.anaconda.com/pkgs/r/noarch
see also miniforge
Every package in my environment is coming from the conda-forge channel
, but just to verify this from a completely clean environment, I ran the following commands:
$ conda create -n sundials6test
$ conda activate sundials6test
$ conda config --env --prepend channels conda-forge
$ conda install sundials=6.0
Which gives me the following installed packages:
$ conda list
# packages in environment at /home/speth/.conda/envs/sundials6test:
#
# Name Version Build Channel
_libgcc_mutex 0.1 conda_forge conda-forge
_openmp_mutex 4.5 1_gnu conda-forge
gmp 6.2.1 h58526e2_0 conda-forge
libblas 3.9.0 12_linux64_openblas conda-forge
libcblas 3.9.0 12_linux64_openblas conda-forge
libgcc-ng 11.2.0 h1d223b6_11 conda-forge
libgfortran-ng 11.2.0 h69a702a_11 conda-forge
libgfortran5 11.2.0 h5c6108e_11 conda-forge
libgomp 11.2.0 h1d223b6_11 conda-forge
liblapack 3.9.0 12_linux64_openblas conda-forge
libopenblas 0.3.18 pthreads_h8fe5266_0 conda-forge
libstdcxx-ng 11.2.0 he4da1e4_11 conda-forge
metis 5.1.0 h58526e2_1006 conda-forge
mpfr 4.1.0 h9202a9a_1 conda-forge
suitesparse 5.10.1 h9e50725_1 conda-forge
sundials 6.0.0 h558c624_1 conda-forge
tbb 2021.5.0 h4bd325d_0 conda-forge
And the unresolved library dependency still exists:
$ ldd ~/.conda/envs/sundials6test/lib/libsundials_sunlinsollapackdense.so
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffc60ce3000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007f814744e000)
libsundials_sunmatrixdense.so.4 => /home/speth/.conda/envs/sundials6test/lib/./libsundials_sunmatrixdense.so.4 (0x00007f8147438000)
liblapack.so.3 => /home/speth/.conda/envs/sundials6test/lib/./liblapack.so.3 (0x00007f81452ee000)
libblis.so.3 => not found
libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f81450fc000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f81475d0000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f81450d7000)
libgfortran.so.5 => /home/speth/.conda/envs/sundials6test/lib/././libgfortran.so.5 (0x00007f8144f2e000)
libquadmath.so.0 => /home/speth/.conda/envs/sundials6test/lib/./././libquadmath.so.0 (0x00007f8144ef4000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /home/speth/.conda/envs/sundials6test/lib/./././libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007f8144edf000)
indeed, the latest rerender should fix it
Issue:
The package for Sundials 6.0.0 seems to depend on the
blis
package, but this is not actually specified as a dependency for the conda package:I can't find any mention of
blis
in the feedstock here, and this isn't the case for previous Sundials versions.Conda environment (clean environment created by just installing
sundials=6.0
):Details about
conda
and system (conda info
):