Open nealstewart opened 9 months ago
Name | Link |
---|---|
Latest commit | 2d6014318d73a4ca73de4bf693b199183e11f889 |
Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/sites/conda-lock/deploys/65169864a65f330007ad302f |
Deploy Preview | https://deploy-preview-516--conda-lock.netlify.app |
Preview on mobile | Toggle QR Code...Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link. |
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.
This is exciting! Looks fairly straightforward too. Could you please look into and fix these test failures?
I'm a bit overloaded at the moment, so no promises on timelines for getting this merged, but I'm hoping it will be easy once the CI is green.
I'd love to see this change landβit would be super useful to be able to update an existing env to match a lockfile, rather than deleting/recreating the env as seems to happen now. The latter approach is unsafe for any shared environments (e.g. a JupyterHub kernel env), but conda-lock would be very useful there for updating environments predictably.
Neal, any chance you plan to come back to this and get CI to pass?
Description
See [issue 515](https://github.com/conda/conda-lock/issues/515 for background on why this was implemented.
I have implemented this as an optional
--update
flag to be based toconda-lock install
.This allows for the following use-case, which will support staged Docker builds, e.g. for light-weight testing images:
I've copied the existing test and there's some potential for deduplication, but I've gone for simplicity. More than happy to refactor the two highly-coupled tests a bit.