Closed marcoesters closed 2 months ago
LGTM but I wonder if the output files should be one per installer, named as {installer-name}-{version}.{extension}.{algorithm}
; e.g. for Miniconda-24.5.0_py310.sh
we would find SHA256 in Miniconda-24.5.0_py310.sh.sha256
. I'm thinking of these files published next to the installers in Miniforge, for example.
LGTM but I wonder if the output files should be one per installer, named as
{installer-name}-{version}.{extension}.{algorithm}
; e.g. forMiniconda-24.5.0_py310.sh
we would find SHA256 inMiniconda-24.5.0_py310.sh.sha256
. I'm thinking of these files published next to the installers in Miniforge, for example.
I think that makes sense since users will download only one installer and then shasum -c
would fail. I used the entire filename for simplicity though, which Miniforge does as well.
Description
Add option to output hashes of installer file. The file format is written in a way that it can be verified with
shasum -c
and similar UNIX tools.In order to work with
installer_type: all
(see issue #814), I merged the info objects before creating outputs. I'm not sure if that closes the issue, but it's a temporary workaround.Checklist - did you ...
news
directory (using the template) for the next release's release notes?