Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Some packages have non-Python dependencies, but are otherwise Python packages. For example they may depend on a C/C++/etc. library they link to, they may interface with Java code, or have some other such use cases. As these dependencies are not dependencies pip can handle, package authors leave them out. However often package maintainers know they exist and have already included them. Would be great to have some kind of mechanism to include these non-Python dependencies.
Describe the solution you'd like
One solution would be to just trust that any dependencies listed in a recipe are meant to be there. Though Grayskull could warn or flag with a comment any that it didn't find these in setup.py (say if they are Python dependencies, but got dropped by upstream).
Another solution might be to allow users to specify a list of these either directly to the CLI or via a file that contains them.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Considered at least one above, but there may be more.
One component of this is that Grayskull seems to drop build dependencies (like compilers, other build tools, etc.). These should ideally be left in place untouched
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Some packages have non-Python dependencies, but are otherwise Python packages. For example they may depend on a C/C++/etc. library they link to, they may interface with Java code, or have some other such use cases. As these dependencies are not dependencies
pip
can handle, package authors leave them out. However often package maintainers know they exist and have already included them. Would be great to have some kind of mechanism to include these non-Python dependencies.Describe the solution you'd like
One solution would be to just trust that any dependencies listed in a recipe are meant to be there. Though Grayskull could warn or flag with a comment any that it didn't find these in
setup.py
(say if they are Python dependencies, but got dropped by upstream).Another solution might be to allow users to specify a list of these either directly to the CLI or via a file that contains them.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Considered at least one above, but there may be more.
Additional context
Recently this came up with Dask-SQL's Java dependencies ( https://github.com/conda-forge/dask-sql-feedstock/pull/28 ), but this can and does come up in a variety of places