Open mbargull opened 1 month ago
It looks like the CDN sync for bioconda uses a pretty outdated setup:
bioconda
<item><title>...</title><pubDate>...</pubDate></item>
I wanted us to finally start using .conda packages, hence the last point is the most pressing issue.
.conda
What can I do to expedite the CDN sync setup update for bioconda?
This is really a dupe of gh-866 and probably just needs the same handling as nvidia: https://github.com/conda/infrastructure/issues/945 . I'm no fan of opening duplicate issues, but doing this for visibility in due to https://github.com/conda/infrastructure/issues/866#issuecomment-2015150491 .
nvidia
No response
Thanks for opening this ticket, I concur this should be improved. CCing @chenghlee.
Checklist
n'tfind a duplicateWhat happened?
It looks like the CDN sync for
bioconda
uses a pretty outdated setup:<item><title>...</title><pubDate>...</pubDate></item>
format.I wanted us to finally start using
.conda
packages, hence the last point is the most pressing issue.What can I do to expedite the CDN sync setup update for
bioconda
?This is really a dupe of gh-866 and probably just needs the same handling as
nvidia
: https://github.com/conda/infrastructure/issues/945 . I'm no fan of opening duplicate issues, but doing this for visibility in due to https://github.com/conda/infrastructure/issues/866#issuecomment-2015150491 .Conda Info
No response
Conda Config
No response
Conda list
No response
Additional Context
No response