Closed AdithyaKrishnan closed 4 months ago
@portersrc @fitzthum DCO passing finally.
Ok, higher level question here. Maybe @wainersm will have some good advice.
Do you think we should have a separate workflow for SEV? I'm not sure if this is going to scale very well as we introduce more tests. Can we instead modify the existing e2e workflow to add SEV/SNP support?
Ok, higher level question here. Maybe @wainersm will have some good advice.
Do you think we should have a separate workflow for SEV? I'm not sure if this is going to scale very well as we introduce more tests. Can we instead modify the existing e2e workflow to add SEV/SNP support?
Well the workflow should be similar, shouldn't it? Only the set of tests and perhaps some setup parts will differ and that should be part of the scripts but IMO the workflows should be shared as much as possible.
Ok, higher level question here. Maybe @wainersm will have some good advice. Do you think we should have a separate workflow for SEV? I'm not sure if this is going to scale very well as we introduce more tests. Can we instead modify the existing e2e workflow to add SEV/SNP support?
Well the workflow should be similar, shouldn't it? Only the set of tests and perhaps some setup parts will differ and that should be part of the scripts but IMO the workflows should be shared as much as possible.
Yes, that's how I see it as well.
See https://github.com/confidential-containers/operator/pull/383/files for an example
The ccruntime-pr.yaml file has been modified and works only for amd specific tests currently. Work adds on to operator pull 295