Closed config-i1 closed 3 years ago
+1
Things to do in alm:
While step 3 can be done simultaneously, this would complicate and slow down the estimation process. Check how this is done in GAMLSS.
A better option for the scale is to implement it in the style of occurrence part of the model (i.e. separate model of a separate class). This way the same scale model can be used together with different location models.
Ths stuff currently works for Normal distribution and might work for others (needs checking). (1) - (9) are done (ignoring 9). Estimation is done simultaneously.
Things left to do:
(1) is done.
A new model and a new approach is being developed in ac1c75999f660c6830d7a1389f3acba0f3e3ad23
sm method for the scale model based on any other linear model.
Things left:
(4) is done.
Looks like only (3) is left
All done. Now I need to update the vignette.
Done.
This can be a new parameter in alm(), determining the formula for the scale, e.g. sigma^2_j = a_0 + a_1 x_j + a_2 x_j^2:
This is relatively easy to implement and it can be estimated together with the parameters for the location (that are already in place) via the maximisation of likelihood. This probably does not make sense for the other losses.