Open Priestch opened 1 year ago
I am open to supporting this, but I will likely not implement anything myself until I have a usecase for it.
I'm not aware of any benefits to using grass
as a replacement for node-sass
compared to the official sass
package. I have not benchmarked a potential implementation of a node package using FFI, and I am not interested in maintaining a node API.
Is there a reason you would like commonjs to be supported, other than potential performance gains?
All I want are the potential performance gains.
I try to replace node-sass in a project, but found only the ES module is supported, will you consider supporting this?