Closed jethrogb closed 8 years ago
@jethrogb You bring up a good point. I don't think I am allowed to re-license code without contributors' agreement so I will ask every contributor here.
To the following people, do you agree to license your contributions under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license ?
No objection here.
Either or both license is fine by me.
Either case is fine by me
Either is okay with me.
Thanks a lot for your quick replies @petevine @retep998 @equalsraf and @dcuddeback ! @psych0d0g, what do you think ?
Terribly sorry to bother you with this @psych0d0g but I think I'm legally required to ask for your consent here. Would you be OK with relicensing your contribution as Apache 2.0 ?
@conradkleinespel Try emailing @psych0d0g with the email address attached to one of their commits.
His commits are merely some changes to Cargo.toml that from the looks of it might not be copyrightable.
Especially since all of those lines have since been rewritten anyway, so even if it was copyrightable it no longer applies to the current version.
Sorry for taking so long. @jethrogb and @retep998, you are 100% right. I've clarified licensing so it now clearly says Apache 2.0 everywhere. Thanks all !
The new version is up on crates.io under version 0.2.3
.
Which license is this crate? Cargo.toml says Apache but README.md says MIT. Or is it both such as most Cargo crates?