Readme request-statuses new fields on denied too_many_requests inconsistency?

Hi Juan,

Good catch. I think this was an oversight leftover from an earlier draft. I'll change it to say processing_details like the other denied statuses.

On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 7:25 AM Juan A. Ruz @.***> wrote:

Hi folks wondering if there is an inconsistency in the README doc regarding request statuses https://github.com/consumer-reports-innovation-lab/data-rights-protocol/tree/main?tab=readme-ov-file#302-request-statuses

all the denied responses contains processing_details but too_many_requests says details? ...

is it a intentional diffence or just a missing detail?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/consumer-reports-innovation-lab/data-rights-protocol/issues/76, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AX5L4MKT7WQSWB7VJ6ABM3LYSNXFLAVCNFSM6AAAAABC5XJ7HWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGEZDEOJSGAZTAOI . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.*** .com>

This e-mail message is intended only for the designated recipient(s) named above. The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not review, retain, copy, redistribute or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, or disclose all or any part of its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments from your computer system.

consumer-reports-innovation-lab / data-rights-protocol

Readme request-statuses new fields on denied too_many_requests inconsistency? #76