Closed moufmouf closed 8 years ago
:+1: maybe we should open another issue to discuss the name? I'm not a big fan of it, but I have trouble coming up with something better that is still explicit…
Actually, I like the name pretty much. I don't think I can find any better name. Of course, I'd like to replace that "service" part with something more generic, but I don't think that "entry-provider" would be as explicit for most of the PHP developers out there.
true. OK to register it on Packagist then?
I'd say yes! I have a bunch of questions however (particularly regarding the use of "static" interfaces), but I'll open that in a separate thread.
:+1:
In particular, added "name" and "autoload" section to be able to use the package.