Open AkihiroSuda opened 7 years ago
@AkihiroSuda I am not sure if I want to see my name in a mediatype. :stuck_out_tongue:
application/vnd.continuity.manifest.v1+pb
That looks okay to me.
@dmcgowan Any opinions here?
application/vnd.continuity.manifest.v1+pb
is fine by me. Not sure we are in a point where we want to nail down a media type version though.
@AkihiroSuda where do you see this media type as being used?
Not sure we are in a point where we want to nail down a media type version though.
More like application/vnd.continuity.manifest.v0+pb
or application/vnd.continuity.manifest.vthisisgoingtobreak+pb
.
+1 for application/vnd.continuity.manifest.v0+pb
.
where do you see this media type as being used?
I'm trying to use continuity as an OCI image layer that can be content-addressable in the granularity of file. So I needed media type information.
My WIP idea is available at https://github.com/AkihiroSuda/filegrain/tree/v20170217 .
I think you have considered something similar to this previously. I'd appreciate if you can give me your feedback. 😃
@AkihiroSuda This was always an intended eventual application of continuity. The main benefit here is the ability to share data between root filesystems.
In general, filegrain looks interesting. I would recommend, as I said in response to your proposal, to move the continuity manifest further down towards the configuration and represent the file requirements in a new dependencies
field on manifest to avoid having the distribution stack to understand continuity.
Please consider defining a media type? e.g.
application/vnd.stevvooe.continuity.manifest.v1+pb
(But I'm not sure what is the de facto standard of a suffix for protobuf. Seems undefined in RFC https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_type#Suffix )