Closed shahzzzam closed 4 years ago
Hi @shahzzzam. Thanks for your PR.
I'm waiting for a containerd member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test
on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.
Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test
label.
I understand the commands that are listed here.
@ktock @cpuguy83 @estesp @thaJeztah can you help me understand which commits i need to cherry-pick into CRI 1.4 to unblock myself on https://github.com/containerd/containerd/pull/4740
Seems you are picking right commits. 57f541b is needed if you want to enable the remote snapshotter without facing the issue of label size limitation (https://github.com/containerd/stargz-snapshotter/issues/144). (but this patch is already merged into the master
branch of containerd/containerd
)
@ktock I see. @estesp mentioned https://github.com/containerd/containerd/pull/4740#issuecomment-729295050 https://github.com/containerd/containerd/pull/4740#issuecomment-729295050 that I need this in release/1.4 of CRI first, then vendor it out to containerd version/1.4
. So we need all the commits related to the change e398fb to go into release/1.4
Why is the CI failing?
@shahzzzam https://github.com/containerd/cri/pull/1607
We should get #1607 merged today and then you can rebase to get a clean CI run.
@shahzzzam https://github.com/containerd/cri/pull/1607 was merged, can you try rebasing?
Thanks! It's passing the CIs @thaJeztah @estesp
Signed-off-by: Samarth Shah samarthmshah@gmail.com
We leverage stargz-based snapshotter and have implemented our own Filesystem interface. We need the image digest to get some metadata for the image itself.