search

containerd / nri

Node Resource Interface
Apache License 2.0
220 stars 58 forks source link

gha: remove GOPATH and workingdir, update actions/setup-go@v4, actions/checkout@v4 #53

Closed thaJeztah closed 9 months ago

codecov-commenter commented 9 months ago

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: +0.05% :tada:

Comparison is base (e2d9a1b) 64.55% compared to head (239594b) 64.61%.

:exclamation: Current head 239594b differs from pull request most recent head 0296210. Consider uploading reports for the commit 0296210 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #53 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 64.55% 64.61% +0.05% ========================================== Files 9 9 Lines 1834 1834 ========================================== + Hits 1184 1185 +1 + Misses 499 498 -1 Partials 151 151 ``` [see 1 file with indirect coverage changes](https://app.codecov.io/gh/containerd/nri/pull/53/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=containerd)

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

thaJeztah commented 9 months ago

Looks like the containerd "project" action depends on GOPATH in some way; need to check why (and if we can fix that)

klihub commented 9 months ago

Looks like the containerd "project" action depends on GOPATH in some way; need to check why (and if we can fix that)

Actually it is not the DCO check that failed but the file header check. And looking at the action it looks like it requires the working-directory input to be set. Now I wonder how come it did not fail with an error message complaining about that. Looks like it went berserk instead and scanned all files it could then complained about the lack of the containerd licence header.

thaJeztah commented 9 months ago

Yes, I spotted that working-dir "required" property in the project-check repository; so I think that could be related indeed.

Guess I need to look more into that; in the meantime, I reverted the GOPATH, path, and working-dir changes for the project-checks (but kept it for all the other changes). I think that should probably unblock this PR