Closed alakesh closed 3 years ago
@mxpv if I remember correctly from the last time, we probably need a branch at some point so that references to this action don't have to specify a tag (e.g. v1.0.2) to use "new features" in the action. I think you have to name the branch v1
for example, to get anyone currently using this version to automatically start using anything merged to that branch?
@estesp Yep, branch option is the easiest. According to this: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/creating-actions/about-actions#using-branches-for-release-management
We can just have v1
branch and merge changes there whenever we ready to publish them.
Showing the content of the diff helps debugging.
Signed-off-by: Alakesh Haloi alakeshh@amazon.com
notes: Sometimes project check fails in github builds indicating file modifications not in commit. But in local builds, those files are not shown modified outside of the commit. Being able to check the diff content in build artifact's raw content will greatly reduce time to debug such issues.