Closed jluebbe closed 2 months ago
I've noticed that autotools builds both a shared and a static library, so I've updated this PR to do that as well.
Tried this out, it's so much faster than autotools! Nice!
Doing a diff -uNr
between the two builds, I see:
--- /tmp/composefs-autotools/usr/lib64/pkgconfig/composefs.pc 2024-06-28 09:50:22.074577014 -0400
+++ /tmp/composefs-meson/usr/lib64/pkgconfig/composefs.pc 2024-06-28 09:49:34.856786643 -0400
@@ -1,13 +1,10 @@
prefix=/usr
-exec_prefix=${prefix}
-libdir=/usr/lib64
includedir=${prefix}/include
+libdir=${prefix}/lib64
-Name: Composefs
+Name: composefs
Description: library for generating and using composefs images
Version: 1.0.4
-Requires:
-Requires.private: libcrypto
+Requires.private: libcrypto
Libs: -L${libdir} -lcomposefs
-Libs.private: -lcrypto
Cflags: -I${includedir}
Which looks totally fine to me. Digging into the differences via diffoscope
on the generated binaries and shared libraries, everything I see looks like it's an artifact of either:
But that's all fine.
Thanks so much for doing this! I'm still in favor of dropping autotools; will file a tracker issue where we can debate that.
This adds support for meson as an alternative build system to autotools.