containers / fetchit

FetchIt is used to manage the life cycle and configuration of Podman containers
https://fetchit.readthedocs.io/
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
124 stars 23 forks source link

Project status #307

Open FlxPeters opened 1 year ago

FlxPeters commented 1 year ago

I really like the idea of this project. Thanks for making this available. We are looking for a gitops approach for single instance container hosts and this seams to be the perfect fit

Only the fact that there hasn't been a release since the 0.0.1 a year before makes me curious about the projects status. Is it still maintained?

cooktheryan commented 1 year ago

We haven't cut a release in a little while there are a few things we would like to patch up before cutting a release. We have been working from deploying and running based on main which I know is not best practice. If there are specific items you would like to see or would like to potentially not see for a next release please let us know.

/cc @sallyom

FlxPeters commented 1 year ago

Thanks for clarifying!

brandonp42 commented 1 year ago

Hi, sorry to barge in here but for what it's worth one feature I'd like to see is support for docker-compose files. Or if it's already supported then more info in the documentation on how to use them.

cooktheryan commented 1 year ago

We would definitely be open to that integration especially if there is a podman binding already written for it.

On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 1:31 PM Brandon Peterson @.***> wrote:

Hi, sorry to barge in here but for what it's worth one feature I'd like to see is support for docker-compose files. Or if it's already supported then more info in the documentation on how to use them.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/containers/fetchit/issues/307#issuecomment-1685058922, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA5CZFBGUWA7Z2EZH55IJHTXWDZ65ANCNFSM6AAAAAA3OVGBNA . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>

KyleSanderson commented 1 year ago

We haven't cut a release in a little while there are a few things we would like to patch up before cutting a release. We have been working from deploying and running based on main which I know is not best practice. If there are specific items you would like to see or would like to potentially not see for a next release please let us know.

/cc @sallyom

Totally get it - not all shops run this way though and the last release was now over a year ago(!). Even if there's functionally no difference, a 0.0.2 would still be desired as opposed to building a commit from a user perspective.

KyleSanderson commented 3 months ago

@cooktheryan happy 2 year anniversary.