Closed BlackHole1 closed 5 days ago
@mheon Modification completed, request re-review
LGTM
On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 05:43 Kevin Cui @.***> wrote:
@mheon https://github.com/mheon Modification completed, request re-review
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/containers/podman/pull/22972#issuecomment-2167154080, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB3AOCBET23OQYW2P2VDGOLZHJRGBAVCNFSM6AAAAABJFQKSL2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCNRXGE2TIMBYGA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
code lgtm, please consider a release note.
please rebase
do we have a test that uses -f for a non-existent file ?
please rebase
Done
do we have a test that uses -f for a non-existent file ?
I checked, and currently, there isn't one. Also, because this logic is within a large function, writing a unit test is quite difficult. Maybe we could add an e2e test?
Looks like some tests need to be fixed.
@mheon @baude @rhatdan I added e2e tests and updated the code (which is now a bit more complex than before), please review the PR again.
LGTM
/approve
code is fine, i did add a nit comment wondering if we can clean up readability ... will let @Luap99 break the tie.
Ephemeral COPR build failed. @containers/packit-build please check.
@Luap99 @baude Done
Friendly ping :)
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by: BlackHole1, Luap99, mheon
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
The pull request process is described here
When the user specifies a Containerfile or Dockfile with the -f flag in podman build, if the file does not exist, the error should be intuitive to the user.
Fixed: #22940
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?