Open lsm5 opened 1 year ago
trigger: pull_request
and trigger: commit
jobs.@dougsland does that help ^ ?
@dougsland does that help ^ ?
Sure, it's a start. :-)
@pypingou could you please help us with the automotive sig ?
@Yarboa could you please review this one as you are leading the packit effort now ?
Sure, let me check
- Create a couple of coprs in the automotive sig group. One for running builds to test every PR, and another for builds after a PR is committed to main.
- Update .packit.yaml to use those 2 coprs for
trigger: pull_request
andtrigger: commit
jobs.
Update: it's probably better to create
just 1 copr in the automotive sig to host packages built after commit to main branch. For trigger: pull_request
tasks, you can just use the ephemeral copr that packit creates.
@dougsland looking here https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/groups/g/centos-automotive-sig/coprs/ I do not see qm copr, Once you create qm project it is easy to change owner and project in packit.yaml
@sandrobonazzola do you have the permission to create QM under centos-automotive-sig/coprs?
Yes, i have permission. Do you need a new repo or do you think qm
can fit into any of the existing ones?
Yes, i have permission. Do you need a new repo or do you think
qm
can fit into any of the existing ones?
I would go with a new one but I am okay with existing one. What's your suggestion?
if it's for building on every commit I would suggest to go with a new copr like bluechi did (https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/centos-automotive-sig/bluechi-snapshot/) so something like qm-snapshot
.
For tagged releases, I assume they'll eventually land in Automotive SIG/AutoSD so I would suggest to push tagged builds to https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/centos-automotive-sig/next/
if it's for building on every commit I would suggest to go with a new copr like bluechi did (https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/centos-automotive-sig/bluechi-snapshot/) so something like
qm -snapshot
.
This one seems more appropriate. Thanks Sandro!
So, are you going to use bluechi-snapshot or do you want me to create qm-snapshot for you?
So, are you going to use bluechi-snapshot or do you want me to create qm-snapshot for you?
Could you please create qm-snapshot? I believe for now, access will be required for me (devel), yariv (qe) and you as centos maint.
COPR repository created, please request permission for it at https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/centos-automotive-sig/qm-snapshot/permissions/
COPR repository created, please request permission for it at https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/centos-automotive-sig/qm-snapshot/permissions/
requested, thanks a lot @sandrobonazzola ! Kudos!
@Yarboa PTAL
COPR repository created, please request permission for it at https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/centos-automotive-sig/qm-snapshot/permissions/
requested, thanks a lot @sandrobonazzola ! Kudos!
@Yarboa PTAL
Thank you @sandrobonazzola :rocket:
@lsm5 could you please just open an issue against QM with your view and steps which we should approach? I can take the lead to make it happen.
Originally posted by @dougsland in https://github.com/containers/qm/issues/122#issuecomment-1653756377