Closed lionel-m closed 9 years ago
I don't think so. The master branch will change over time and the links will break. It makes more sense to link to a specific version and maybe add another link to a second version if something has changed (e.g. the hook parameters)
Yes so we can use preferably the LTS versions for that... I'll update the links with the 3.5 version.
I'm not sure here for the first link:
- [index.php](https://github.com/contao/core/blob/2.11.7/index.php#L306)
- [system/modules/frontend/FrontendTemplate.php](https://github.com/contao/core/blob/2.11.7/system/modules/frontend/FrontendTemplate.php#L147)
Is this correct? I have not found other references...
- [...](https://github.com/contao/core/blob/3.5.0/system/modules/core/controllers/FrontendIndex.php#L361-L368)
- [...](https://github.com/contao/core/blob/3.5.0/system/modules/core/classes/FrontendTemplate.php#L224-L231)
Thanks
It is, but maybe it would make sense to show both links? like index.php in Contao 2.11-3.2 / FrontendIndex.php in Contao 3.3+
I continue like this: Ok?
#### Versions from 2.11 to 3.2
- [index.php](https://github.com/contao/core/blob/2.11.7/index.php#L306)
- [system/modules/frontend/FrontendTemplate.php](https://github.com/contao/core/blob/2.11.7/system/modules/frontend/FrontendTemplate.php#L147)
#### Versions from 3.3
- [system/modules/core/controllers/FrontendIndex.php](https://github.com/contao/core/blob/3.5.0/system/modules/core/controllers/FrontendIndex.php#L361-L368)
- [system/modules/core/classes/FrontendTemplate.php](https://github.com/contao/core/blob/3.5.0/system/modules/core/classes/FrontendTemplate.php#L224-L231)
Examples are sometimes different between versions. We must also add several examples? The number of parameters can change too.
I don't know if the FrontendTemplate
changed significantly, so the version with headlines has the disadvantage of potentially listing the same thing multiple times without differences. My initial thought was like this:
- [index.php *in Contao 2.11 - 3.2*](https://github.com/contao/core/blob/2.11.7/index.php#L306)
- [FrontendIndex.php *in Contao 3.3+*](https://github.com/contao/core/blob/3.5.0/system/modules/core/controllers/FrontendIndex.php#L361-L368)
- [system/modules/frontend/FrontendTemplate.php](https://github.com/contao/core/blob/2.11.7/system/modules/frontend/FrontendTemplate.php#L147)
Your version might be clearer though… But if you say "from 3.3" then we should also link to the 3.3 version.
The code can be (~)identical but the disadvantage is that the folders structure changes...
I propose to highlight only the LTS versions. A link for 2.11, 3.2 and 3.5. The structure of the page remains the same and clear. What do you think?
well that would need we need to update the links more often. On the other hand, there is no reason (from a release-cycle perspective) to keep the old LTS links. So we could also simply use links for only Contao 3.5 everywhere?
well that would need we need to update the links more often. On the other hand, there is no reason (from a release-cycle perspective) to keep the old LTS links. So we could also simply use links for only Contao 3.5 everywhere?
I totally agree with you :)
All references are based on version 3.5
Under references, the links are targeted to the branch 2.11.7
Should we use the master branch?