Closed ausi closed 2 years ago
Idea for better backwards compatibility:
Still calculate the old hash, and if the resized image already exists with the old name, return it. But if it does not exist, create a new image with the new hash algorithm instead.
Do we need backwards compatibility? We could also ask the users to rebuild their cache.
We could also ask the users to rebuild their cache.
This can be a very huge number of images that have to be regenerated. If the backwards compatibililty can be achieved without too much effort I would favor it.
Closed in favor of #90
The paths for resized versions of private images should not be guessable for security reasons.
See contao/contao@
9c517c7
(#3848)