But I would argue that term is a little too clumsy as a primary glossary term. But it works nicely as 'content objects', because that's what OOUX is about, using content objects to define the types of content that need modeled.
A ref to use:
S. Voychehovski, Object Oriented UX, A List Apart, Issue 431, 2015, (accessed March 7, 2016).
This was originally proposed as 'object-oriented UX'... https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IYat8nnDmdHREpKVKblTNkzbF1wqJxi8PyewiuzVzSQ/edit
But I would argue that term is a little too clumsy as a primary glossary term. But it works nicely as 'content objects', because that's what OOUX is about, using content objects to define the types of content that need modeled.
A ref to use: