Open Exotelis opened 1 year ago
@Exotelis
Thank you for your valuable feedback. We recognize the importance of strong typing, and your observation regarding extension/custom field types is well noted. We'll investigate this further and prioritize adding type support for these cases in our upcoming roadmap.
Hello,
thank you for creating this fantastic package. We've recently begun using it, and it has significantly improved our contentstack typing.
One observation we've made is that every extension/custom field currently returns the type
any
. Is there a possibility to implement typing for these cases too? In most instances, we know the types returned by various extensions, at least in about 99% of the cases.