Open Exotelis opened 1 year ago
@Exotelis
Thank you for your valuable feedback. We recognize the importance of strong typing, and your observation regarding extension/custom field types is well noted. We'll investigate this further and prioritize adding type support for these cases in our upcoming roadmap.
Any update on this? @shafeeqd959
Hello,
thank you for creating this fantastic package. We've recently begun using it, and it has significantly improved our contentstack typing.
One observation we've made is that every extension/custom field currently returns the type
any
. Is there a possibility to implement typing for these cases too? In most instances, we know the types returned by various extensions, at least in about 99% of the cases.