Ricochet hey

[cranhandler]

Heys should allow a 'ricochet' option (presumably a checkbox similar to balance or meltdown for swing).

the ricochet will need [who, if full hey whether first, last, or both]

This might tie in with a more full hey refactoring (see https://github.com/contradb/contra/issues/290 )

Also, ricochet vs push-back might be a term to include in dialects)

[cranhandler]

example dances at http://contradb.com/dances/447 , http://contradb.com/dances/129

[dcmorse]

Let's think about htis.

On a full hey, four check boxes:

• [ ] first pair first encounter
• [ ] second pair first encounter
• [ ] first pair second encounter
• [ ] second pair second encounter.

On a half hey, only two check boxes:

• [ ] first pair encounter
• [ ] second pair encounter

Since variable numbers of parameters as a function of other parameters are not a thing we can do easily, this'd be an argument for splitting hey into full hey for 4 and half hey for 4, as it was in 2016. That's not incredibly hard, just humbling.

If I remember the hey until request correctly, this will stack pretty ambiguously with that, right? Maybe we need 'hey week'.

Maybe we have a freakin' bank of checkboxes, all on one line

Richochets: 1 [ ]  2 [ ]  3 [ ] 4 [ ]

That'd be opaque to the user until they clicked one and saw the figure text update. Say if they clicked the one labeled 4 on a full hey with gents leading, the figure text would update to gentlespoons start a hey, ladles the 2nd time you pass ricochet back

Getting all 4 checkboxes on the same line would be a formal pain in the drain, and on searches each checkbox would have to be replaced with a 3-way radio (checked, unchecked, and *). Ugh, no let's keep it simple stupid, and put each checkbox on it's own line.