Open cranhandler opened 6 years ago
We have held off on introducing "next ladle" until we can deal with progression in a bigger way. I'm removing this from "Wave Patch" because I don't feel it's actionable without our hazy progression ideas enabled.
Well, the future of progressions has arrived. We have pilcrows. (https://github.com/contradb/contra/pull/471)
So what now?
Figures after a pilcrow get 'next' prepended to each of their 'whos'? That seems like it'll lead to mass chaos, but maybe constructive chaos?
Move to make this an in-person discussion.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 9:36 PM Dave Morse notifications@github.com wrote:
Well, the future of progressions has arrived. We have pilcrows. (#471 https://github.com/contradb/contra/pull/471)
So what now?
Figures after a pilcrow get 'next' prepended to each of their 'whos'? That seems like it'll lead to mass chaos, but maybe constructive chaos?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/contradb/contra/issues/402#issuecomment-436493558, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APbjzRt24CSmbSiM9LeG7DkA9hhXM_BFks5uslVEgaJpZM4UX2S_ .
need to include "next neighbor" and "next gent" as possible options in the dropdown, for when the new wave formation is the progression. This is similar to 'next neighbor' but we need to specify which role is in the center.