advanced search

[dcmorse]

Here's the mockup:

Things to notice

• the center of the view is mostly blank, and that's where 'traditional' figure search expressions get built
  • a text area, or a few text areas, for text filter on choreographer, title, hook, etc.
• the left side of the screen is divided into filter categories
  1. formation
  2. progression
  3. verified
  4. ...
  5. ? turn on/off my pet-peve filter, that hides results with annoying traits. ?
  6. piece count
  7. tags
     • filter categories have checkbox-bank like subdivisions
     • since many checkbox-banks are really long they're truncated with '+ more' toggles
     • unlike regular checkboxes, these 'checkboxes' have three states: 'on', 'off', and 'either'.
     • on mobile this bar is somehow iconified - swipe?
• the right bar of the screen (not actually pictured) is for composing the current program. You can drop dances into a program on the fly, and see feedback on your program as you build it.
  • on mobile this bar is somehow iconified - swipe?

[dcmorse]

@cranhandler can we have a reprioritization given that this image assumed these things were the starting line, but they're actually not done yet?:

1. search by choreographer, title, and in a separate blank, search by hook (difficulty 2)
2. old search tree functionality (difficulty 16)

I'll add difficulties to your existing features:

1. formation check boxes (difficulty 2 for the top 3, I'd need to see a wireframe for the expanded one...)
2. progression
   • none/single/double: (difficulty 2)
   • progress & unprogress (need more clarity)
   • progress figure (difficulty 4)
3. verified
   • verified-by-me (difficulty 4)
   • verified & unverified (difficulty 4)
   • broken (needs a way to tag as broken)

If you're reading this by email, be sure to click through, I'm sure I'll update it after markdown surprises me with its rendering of these nested lists.

[cranhandler]

I think we are good to push when we have item 1 (search by choreographer) complete

I'd like to prioritize verified&unverified; verified by me, and broken as the next most important.

none/single/double progression looks like a quick easy it too, and lets us add that element to the sidebar.

Is this enough to march with?

On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 4:26 PM Dave Morse notifications@github.com wrote:

@cranhandler https://github.com/cranhandler can we have a reprioritization given that this image assumed these things were the starting line, but they're actually not done yet?:

1. search by choreographer, title, and in a separate blank, search by hook (difficulty 2)
2. old search tree functionality (difficulty 16)

I'll add difficulties to your existing features:

1. formation check boxes (difficulty 2 for the top 3, I'd need to see a wireframe for the expanded one...)

2. progression

   • none/single/double: (difficulty 2)
   • progress & unprogress (need more clarity)
   • progress figure (difficulty 4)

3. verified

   • verified-by-me (difficulty 4)
   • verified & unverified (difficulty 4)
   • broken (needs a way to tag as broken)

If you're reading this by email, be sure to click through, I'm sure I'll update it after markdown surprises me with its rendering of these nested lists.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/contradb/contra/issues/563?email_source=notifications&email_token=AD3OHTLE7D3F2UB4F3HHMXDQ3EPYFA5CNFSM4G5RLL4KYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEHZJVLI#issuecomment-569547437, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD3OHTOUQK45UOJBHKOV2RLQ3EPYFANCNFSM4G5RLL4A .

-- Allison Jonjak, M.S., E.I.T. allisonjonjak@gmail.com allisonjonjak.com

[dcmorse]

What would you think of this addition, right below 'verified'?

* fancy not-logged-in behavior as under discussion in #618 
** as above and it searches anything by that user, public, private, or sketchbook
*** only displayed to admins, and checked by default to admins

[cranhandler]

Yes and it's perfect.

On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 7:23 AM Dave Morse notifications@github.com wrote:

What would you think of this addition, right below 'verified'? [image: privacy] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10550086/73748273-aae5cf80-471e-11ea-9ed6-337e63762862.jpg

• fancy not-logged-in behavior as under discussion in #618 ** as above and it searches anything by that user, public, private, or sketchbook *** only displayed to admins, and checked by default to admins

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/contradb/contra/issues/563?email_source=notifications&email_token=AD3OHTPEDRTSEJTOWH4N4W3RBFT5BA5CNFSM4G5RLL4KYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEKXTHUQ#issuecomment-581907410, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD3OHTNP3BTJ3TWYKSXEFKTRBFT5BANCNFSM4G5RLL4A .

[dcmorse]

I want to add more filters to the left side here! I want to add so many that we'll run out of vertical screen space unless some way is found to reign them in. Piece count! Username! Number of gendered moves! This-or-that tag!

[dcmorse]

Marking as blocked until there's clarity on how to proceed. In particular, need a decision on which advanced search functionality to build, and a detailed mock on tabs. These are both already cards in Needs Refinement of Core.