Open 40in opened 4 years ago
Hi @40in,
Some time has passed since you posted this... but I wanted to follow-up and see if you're still having issues. I'm currently using the latest standard-version
(7.1.0) and have similar setups across our org.
A few things... for the conventional-changelog
stack to work best, you should follow the Conventional Commits spec. While referencing an issue in the title might work in some contexts... it won't be as well supported as a reference in the [optional footer(s)]
section.
Additionally, when using the convention, make sure you're using the GitHub cross-repository reference, not just the issue number (unless the issue is local to the repository you are commiting to).
ie.
feat(Button): Adds a new button to the interface in santa-mouse.
- Adds the new awesome button, but actually links to an issue in another repository (santa-claus)
awesome-corp/santa-claus#999
If you have a repository local issue and cross-repository issue you need to reference, you can separate with a ,
:
feat(Button): Adds a new button to the interface in santa-mouse.
- Adds the new awesome button, but actually links to an issue in another repository (santa-claus) AND one in this repository (number ten).
awesome-corp/santa-claus#999, #10
Given circumstances:
repos: https://github.com/awesome-corp/santa-claus/ https://github.com/awesome-corp/santa-mouse/
Issue was logged in
santa-claus
repo. And closed with such PR insanta-mouse
repo:feat(button): add new awesome button awesome-corp/santa-claus#999
standard-version
will generate such line:So the actual link will be pointing to wrong repo.